boluopai.Yinyang philosophy and shared methods
This directory maintains the public essays, diagrams, and shared formation guides. Yinyang's public Skill is Empty, where a person and model form their own philosophy, Personal material, and six working accounts. The author's actual entrypoint and personal models are maintained privately. No Full package is offered.
The essays develop a philosophy for personal recursive self-improvement: understanding, judgment, creation, action, and the methods producing later improvements. Read the arguments, consider their grounds, and select what helps your own questions. The practice overview connects these readings with the Empty method.
Reading and practice
| Purpose | Entrance |
|---|---|
| Read the philosophical account | Reading map and the essays below. |
| Form your own practice | Empty and the practice overview. |
| Understand the shared formation method | Forming and revising working models. |
How the texts relate
The essays answer connected questions rather than forming a compulsory course:
| Question | Reading |
|---|---|
| What is the developmental purpose? | Borrowing fire and cultivating creative capacity connects available capacities, personal cultivation, and reciprocal understanding. |
| What claims does Yinyang make? | Core views gives the proposition map. |
| How does meaning acquire a working form? | Practice overview connects expression, relation, realization, and evidence. |
| How do the contributions fit together? | The trinity of philosophy, psychology, and engineering connects philosophy, psychology, engineering, and their practical carriers. |
| What does the central image express? | Mutual becoming through Yinyang and Taiji develops mutual grounding, transformation, and Sun–Moon–Earth. |
| Where do particular arguments and originals belong? | Read by the work being done routes to the essays, diagrams, and philosophical, psychological, and engineering sources. |
Readers outside literature, history, or philosophy can begin by selecting relevant Core views, then follow their linked arguments when needed. For a connected account of the author's purpose, read Borrowing fire → Core views → Practice explanation. Neither route requires an original writing project. Personal accounts and sources stay private; publishing an essay or website is a further choice of interest.
Philosophical ground
The author's worldview takes one changing physical reality as its ground and expresses its becoming through contemporary fire monism. Process ontology concerns how objects form, persist, and change. Computational ontology explicitly expresses selected domain objects, events, states, relations, and transitions for model interpretation, reasoning, and use. Within a private sinthome, natural language can organize person, counterpart, work, and collaboration into model-usable conceptual relations. It can represent actual people and psychological activity, hypothetical situations, or fictional objects. Physical grounding concerns the activity and carriers of representation; what is represented has its own status. Person and language model develop the question, model, realization, and feedback together, dividing contributions by actual capability and purpose. Representations need usable meanings; factual claims are true when they correspond to what is actually the case. Satisfaction and inference within a representation depend on its interpretation and assumptions. Clear model-interpreted language can serve these uses. The World essay develops this connection. Activity histories can be represented as event streams; conceptual person and counterpart models are constructed from those histories and other materials. The participants have their own capacities and mechanisms. Coherent working concepts support stability while evidence and competing interpretations remain open to correction.
Sun and Moon express differentiated generation, reception, and shaping. Person and model participate in those movements, retaining or exchanging emphases; Earth is the answering material and shared living environment. Model companies, researchers, and the wider collective keep acquiring fire; a finite person borrows it to cultivate understanding, judgment, and generation through practice. The little fire person emphasizes kindling further fire; Baby Heraclitus emphasizes that this creator keeps becoming, including through changing and conflicting possibilities. Abilities can internalize or remain reliably supported; AI use, agreement, and output alone do not establish growth. The essays develop these images and claims at their own scale.
Maintenance and contribution
MODEL.md owns interpretation and publication boundaries; AGENTS.md is the maintenance entrance. English reader texts have complete Chinese counterparts. Maintain common material at this shared source and situated accounts at their actual private owner.
Use Issues for questions, corrections, suggestions, or song requests to boluopai. Publish your own philosophy or other articles in your own space and mention or link this repository where relevant. This collection does not accept pull requests. The invitation to create explains these routes. Personal records, formalized portraits, private quotations, and unpublished manuscripts remain outside public distribution.
License
Original Yinyang material uses the Yinyang Personal and Internal Use License 1.0. You may download, privately use and modify it, including to assist paid work. Redistribution and providing it as a product or service for others require separate permission. Independent outputs remain yours. Legal exceptions, GitHub platform permissions, third-party rights, and earlier valid grants remain intact. Other reusable packages retain their package-local MIT licenses.